childrenshealthdefense

Dr. Drew and Mary Holland have a thought-provoking conversation, today, on CHD.TV. They discuss the following topics of interest: -Waking up to the corrupt public health agenda -Censorship and vilification of doctors -Fraudulent clinical trials -Corrupted agencies -Mainstream media culture -Prescribing medicine for pain -Future pandemic framework -...and more! Viewers won’t want to miss this episode!

In decades past, the concept of having a device in a child’s room to track their every movement and pick up on the slightest sound in the name of ‘safety’ and ‘piece of mind’ for the parent would have been completely foreign. Yet, in the 21st century, it is normal for households across the nation to own and use these technologies. But rarely do moms and dads consider the cost — financially, emotionally and physically — of relying upon baby monitors. How many families are aware of the dangers that these pose on the development and overall health of their children? To discuss this critical topic, Shane Reilly joins ‘Good Morning CHD.’

Watch today’s episode of ‘An Informed Life Radio’ to hear from guests Lori Martin Gregory and Drew Outstanding. To kick off the show, Lori provides information about the World Society for Ethical Science launch. Then, retired army officer Drew talks about paralysis after COVID shots and the battle for healing. Be sure to watch!

You may be familiar with chiropractic, but do you understand how it works? Dr. Sarah Kotlerman goes beyond simple adjustments when she helps patients. She works with the body in its natural processes of regeneration to heal tissue and cells. Find out more about the mechanisms and anatomical science behind this healthcare practice, as well as how it benefits patients with chronic illness, on CHD.TV’s ‘Doctors & Scientists’!

EXPLAIN THIS: Why does the medical community warn pregnant women against eating tuna fish due to mercury yet encourage them to receive shots containing not only mercury but also aluminum + formaldehyde? Our FREE eBook — “A Parents’ Guide to Healthy Children” — is the tool to help parents make the best health + wellness decisions for their children. DOWNLOAD + SHARE ⬇️ https://childrenshealthdefense.org/ebook-sign-up/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ebook&utm_id=20240309?utm_source=rumble&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ebook&utm_id=20240321 Watch the WHOLE interview with Paul Thomas + Dr. Northrup on #CHDTV 👇 https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/airport-swabbing-mumps--dengue-vaccines/?utm_source=rumble&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=chdtvpromo&utm_id=20240321

Today, on ‘Financial Rebellion’: Two lawyers discuss the fork in the road where finance. health and the law meet — in the form of various, ongoing lawsuits and legislation. To kick it off, they share details of a case that was filed after multiple individuals were denied entry to national parks. Then, viewers hear an update on litigation involving liability and vaccine injury compensation. We also hear about Murthy v Missouri, social media censorship and the right to free speech. And finally, Carolyn Betts and Ray Flores talk about bank account surveillance, technology and the threat to privacy.

The fight for #freespeech continues. In an interview on Steve Bannon’s WarRoom, Mary Holland expresses her disappointment in SCOTUS’s lackluster reaction to the government’s blatant collusion with social media companies to censor its own citizens' free speech. “What was disappointing was that the court wasn't outraged by the extent of this censorship-industrial complex that has come to exist over the last four years,” Holland reported.👇 Learn more about this landmark case on #CHDTV 👇 https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/murthy-v-missouri-or-oral-arguments-or-mar-18/murthy-v-missouri-oral-arguments-march-18/?utm_source=rumble&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=chdtvpromo&utm_id=20240320

Unlike many of his colleagues, epidemiologist Martin Kuldorff chose to put his career on the line in order that society may arrive at the truth about the pandemic response. He was not only censored on social media for speaking out but also ultimately fired from his position as a professor at an Ivy League school. The silencing and removal of Dr. Kulldorff may be the epitome of what people — teachers, healthcare workers, scientists, students, business owners, parents — across the globe have experienced for expressing ideas and asking questions that contradict the mainstream, overarching narrative. Viewers won’t want to miss this week’s episode of ‘Defender In-Depth’ with Dr. Kulldorff. Tune in, on CHD.TV!

Have you heard? The scarcely known effects of electromagnetic #radiation share the same shadowy stigma as vaccine injuries. Listen as Mary Holland explains why we should ALL be taking #EMR exposure more seriously. Learn KEY solutions so you can protect yourself + your family from #wireless tech + electromagnetic #radiation. 👇 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/electromagnetic-radiation-wireless/?utm_source=rumble&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=emr&utm_id=20240319

Are we living in a digital dystopia? After multiple national park attendees were denied entry due to the implementation of a cashless payment system, legal action has been taken. Guest attorney Ray Flores and ‘Good Morning CHD’ host Michael Kane break down the details of this case and explain the implications of such restrictions on the broader population. Watch the episode, today, on CHD.TV!

Learn more about YOUR RIGHTS as a patient with Nurse Anna on #CHDTV 👇 https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/the-chd-bus-tour/i-worked-in-covid-er-sc/?utm_source=rumble&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20240318

Join us LIVE on the steps of the United States Supreme Court as we show our support for free speech! Tune in to CHD.TV, beginning at 8:45am ET on March 18th, 2024, so you don’t miss out on the 9am rally! Speakers include the following: - Michael Kane: Teachers for Choice - Mary Holland: President of CHD - Dr. Pierre Kory: FLCCC - Sujata Gibson: Health Freedom Attorney - Jeffrey A Tucker: Brownstone Institute - Mikki Willis: Filmmaker - Dr. Aaron Kheriaty: Plaintiff, Psychiatrist - Del Bigtree: HighWire, ICAN ...and many more!! Mary Holland: “This is the most important #freespeech case at least in a generation. If the Supreme Court were to decide this unwisely, our country would NEVER BE THE SAME.” Don’t miss it!

VIVEK H. MURTHY, SURGEON GENERAL, ET AL. v. MISSOURI, ET AL. Oral arguments to be heard by the United States Supreme Court on Monday, March 18th at 10:00am ET | 7:00am PT. Also, be sure to tune in to CHD.TV to watch LIVE ‘The Rally to Reclaim Free Speech’ from the steps of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

"There are contradicting and oftentimes unclear narratives it comes to warnings of ‘Disease X,’ trustworthiness of medical products and the globalists’ plotting over pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. When hearing buzz- words and phrases, such as ‘IHR amendments,’ ‘One Health,’ ‘equity,’ ‘governance,’ ‘multilateralism’ and ‘information dissemination,’ the public is left in murky waters. Furthermore, the media downplays and provides outright false information about the safety, efficacy and implications of past, present and future ‘healthcare’ measures. Rather than shying away from this multifaceted and contentious topic, it is a humanity-wide responsibility to dig deeper into the information provided and weigh the risks and benefits of implementing such strategies. Meryl Nass and her guest on ‘Good Morning CHD,’ Madhava Setty provide context for the global health intitiative, and unlike many of the players funding and funded by them, these two come to the table with no strings attached. In this eye-opening episode, they answer questions, such as: -Could the WHO obtain authority to censor American speech? -What kinds of restrictions over travel and exploitation of private information already exist? -Is there a chance that such measures become obligatory? -How many nation-states are in support of the disputed documents? -When faced with a future public health threat, who determines whether it is an emergency? -Does the average person have any ability to vocalize their opinions and dissentions to those making decisions? -Can something be done to protect personal freedoms, rights and liberties?