The Flex Files

One common pitfall in the political arena, particularly among conservatives, is building a following by repeatedly mentioning Trump. Unfortunately, many have succumbed to this approach, attracting followers not for their insights but by becoming addicted to engagement through repetition of the aforementioned, leaving them unable to provide meaningful insight or guidance. This is detrimental not only to the creators but also to their followers and the movement as a whole. In situations like the current one in Texas, clear-headed leadership and innovative ideas are essential, yet those who have gained prominence by pledging loyalty to Trump rather than developing their political acumen and now find themselves echoing popular sentiment, which may not always be correct. The dispute over border protections, such as razor wire, illustrates this point. The simplest response might be to defy the Supreme Court and arrest anyone attempting to remove fortifications, but this could be a trap. Innovative thinking is required, though it often doesn't lead to quick engagement. People prefer comforting talking points and insular views, which discourage creative thinking and novel solutions. The border situation demands fresh insight to prevent potential civil unrest that could arise from perceived federal government treason. However, the answer isn't as simple as dismissing the Supreme Court's failure. We must recognize the role of intelligence agencies and influential narratives in shaping this complex issue. The knowledge to navigate complex legal issues won't be found in insular thinking. Today, many believe the correct response is to disregard the Supreme Court's authority and the constitutional implications that follow. Conservatives, unlike the establishment, don't play by the same rules; while the establishment may disregard the Constitution to achieve their goals, conservatives strive to preserve the protections that keep this country great. If we undermine the legitimacy of the Supreme Court or its constitutional interpretations, which maintain checks and balances, we risk unraveling the fabric of our nation, leaving little room for peaceful resolutions. We may have already reached or crossed this critical juncture. Therefore, I urge Governor Abbott to seek alternative solutions to the migrant crisis without invalidating the Supreme Court's authority. The long-term damage isn't worth it. In the current strong tide of public opinion, my ideas may seem distant from popular discourse. This is largely because those who are looked to for ideas and opinions are echoing what is popular and obvious due to a lack of necessary insight.