Freedom of speech

On February 6, 2024, a frequent speaker at the Shasta Supervisors meetings had something to say in a way she usually does.

Some citizens, more aligned with the Sacramento State Government, are disrupting supervisor meetings constantly and the sheriff has not done anything about it. Shasta County has elected a majority of supervisors that are dissatisfied with state laws being passed to take away local government's rights. But some citizens feel it is their right to disrupt meetings because they are happy with Sacramento's actions. This video will tell you who is law abiding and who is not. And apparently there is a fiscal conservative that is OK with being disruptive.

http://www.votelaurahobbs.com/ California Code, Government Code - GOV § 8314 (a) states: It is unlawful for any elected state or local officer, including any state or local appointee, employee, or consultant, to use or permit others to use public resources for a campaign activity, or personal or other purposes which are not authorized by law. However, Laura Hobbs IS NOT an: elected state or local officer, an appointee, an employee, or consultant. The Shasta County Legal Advisor was incorrect.

On October 4, 2023, California passed a bill to outlaw hand counting in elections. California must have a vested interest in how the votes are counted to make it illegal to Hand Count. This indicates that there is something very important in using electronic tabulators to count votes.? A big effort was made promptly to counter Shasta County's decision to hand count. Why should it matter? Could it be that there is a back door to these machines? Could it be the software as well as the device? I say this is a very strong possibility. Using either way of counting should be no business of the state. Why were Bernie Sanders voter upset in the California primaries? Go figure? If we don't get smart soon, I fear we will be slaves.

SHASTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, OCTOBER 17, 2023 IN REGARDS TO CALIFORNIA'S ELECTION VOTING SYSTEMS BILL AB-969 *HAND COUNTING WITH OBSERVERS IS THE ONLY SECURE METHOD OF COUNTING VOTES. MACHINES ARE OPERATED BY PEOPLE WHO CAN POSSIBLY MANIPULTE THE MACHINES. *THE OPTICAL SCANNERS SHOULD ONLY BE THE EYES OF HUMAN VOTE COUNTERS AND OBSERVERS. *DUE TO MISTRUST, MACHINE COMPANIES WILL NOT REVEAL THE SOURCE CODES OR PASSWORDS THAT CAN KEEP IN CHECK MACHINE CALCULATIONS. = YOU CANNOT TRUST WITHOUT OBSERVATION. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB969 YOU CAN'T TRUST MACHINES BECAUSE YOU CAN'T WATCH THEM WORK AND OBSERVERS CAN'T EXAMINE THEM.

Shasta County voted Thursday to pass a Second Amendment Resolution. County citizens are apposed to unconstitutional infringements from the Sacramento's Democrat supermajority lawmakers. The California lawmakers are reducing penalties and prison sentences, and at the same time passing tougher restrictions for legal gun owners. You can tell this by the lawlessness that now exists in the streets of San Francisco and Los Angeles. Please support the CRPA https://crpa.org/

I stopped Mrs. Baily as she was walking out of the chambers and told her that I have worked with the UNABOM task force as a composite artist, and told her that the man who was upset with Alex for using the N-word, and Supervisor Jones for removing him (the upset man, not Alex) from the meeting, has a record of misconduct. She quickly answered me saying that this upset man had pulled a gun on her daughter, but she said that she had forgiven him and wanted everything to be forgotten. However, this person accusing Supervisor Jones, doesn't have the same forgiveness that he was granted to him by Mrs. Baily, and is trying to get Jones to give up his chair position. Here's the police report about the incident: NEWS RELEASE May 17th, 2021. 2:00 PM Redding Police Conclude Battery Investigation On May 5th, 2021, Redding Police were notified of a media report regarding a battery incident between 42-year-old Carlos Zapata of Palo Cedro and 32-year-old Nathaniel Pinkney of Redding. The incident occurred on the evening of May 4th in downtown Redding. After learning of the incident, Redding Police Detectives began an investigation into the allegations. During the investigation, detectives spoke with witnesses and viewed video surveillance to determine what occurred. The investigation concluded that on May 4th, Carlos Zapata and his spouse arrived at a local restaurant around 7:40 P.M. and sat at the bar as patrons. Pinkney was working as a cook in the rear kitchen area. Pinkney became aware that Zapata was in the restaurant and made contact with him from behind the bar. A verbal argument between Pinkney and Zapata ensued, during which time Zapata tossed a glass of liquid. The glass shattered, and liquid spilled on Pinkney. Zapata was asked to leave the restaurant, and he complied. After Zapata left the restaurant, he was followed by Pinkney and a co-worker Kenneth Cornelius, 32 years of Redding, to another downtown business. Pinkney, Cornelius, and Zapata became involved in a second verbal argument at the other downtown business. Zapata was joined by two acquaintances who were customers at the location. They were later identified as 45-year-old Christopher Meagher of Redding and 40-year-old Elizabeth Bailey of Anderson. This argument eventually carried on into a parking lot in downtown Redding. During this verbal argument, it appears Bailey grabbed Pinkney’s shirt. Pinkney was able to pull away from the Baileys grasp and then was struck in the face with one punch from Meagher. Meagher was then hit with one punch from Cornelius. Meagher grabbed ahold of a large CO2 bottle from a local business and held it toward Pinkney and Cornelius in a threatening manner before placing it back down and leaving the area. There was no further physical contact between the involved parties. None of the involved parties sustained any significant injuries. Following the assault, Pinkney went back into the business he was working at and armed himself with a handgun. It appeared this is a firearm owned and registered to Pinkney. After arming himself, Pinkney made statements he was going to shoot the other involved party but did not provide a specific name. Other employees were able to disarm Pinkney and calm him down. This investigation has been submitted to the Shasta County District Attorney’s office for review. Any further questions will be referred to the Shasta County District Attorney’s office. Authored by: Sergeant Rob Garnero #395 Reviewed by: Captain Poletski #610

Who to blame? Shasta County employees want a better raise, but times have been tough, and citizens who pay taxes haven't had a good enough raise either.

Lawsuits against self, doesn't prove anything. But you can write off a bundle. This has nothing to do with the argument over voting procedures.

Shasta County employees complain of low wages.

Scientific mathematical evidence of election fraud. https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/findings-of-the-colorado-voting-machine-investigation/ Lets be fair: Logically half of the voters feel the machines are corrupt, but the other half feel the machines are accurate. So we have a voter integrity problem. In the advent of a close election, a hand count is required to resolve the count. Both sides would agree that an observed hand count is trustworthy. So to have 100% satisfaction, a hand count would be acceptable to both viewpoints.

The Board of education couldn't wait to vote to adopt the preferred pronoun policy. England after adopting such a policy, decided to reverse their decision. This is a mistake.

Nick says: Forty years ago, California was in the top ten in education; now it's near the bottom.

Nigel asks the Board of Education to research the root of the 'Non Discrimination Harassment Policy'

The 'Non Discrimination Harassment Policy' is against the Constitution and this policy is inviting legal trouble.

The Board of Education should be talking with the parents.

Jackie asks the school board to listen to the people because it is about the kids. She points out that children are not able to make decisions that will change their lives.

Marlene points out the large yearly increase in the LGBTQ students, indicating that children are being psychologically damaged as to think themselves a victim. She states that this psychological influence leads to the child doing harm to themselves that will make it impossible for them to procreate as an adult.

Gennie Winstead, a public school teacher says: Children are not naturally confused about their gender. They're being confused by adults wanting to indoctrinate and push a certain agenda. Public schools have no business getting involve with any kind of propaganda.

Kevin Crye, a newly elected county supervisor mentions how the government took away physical education because of COVID, and now they intend to push weight loss drugs on kids. He asks the board to defend our constitution and defend our kids.

Dolores warns the board of legal action.

Steve says: The fact is, these people actually exist. They're not freaks, they don't wake up in the morning and think they are going to go out and shock you, or shock me. Their lives are just as real and genuine as ours.

Richard Gallardo scorns the Shasta County School Board for Brown Act violations and identifies the source of the argument, California Assembly Bill 1266. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB1266

Nelda tells the board, you think Sexual Grooming our Children, is OK, it's not OK

Ashley says 'What's been going on in Shasta County like COVID, I feel this is another mistake that our board of education is going to continue on.'