[CLIP] Trump Vindicated? Kash Patel Explains the New Jan. 6 Report | ATL:NOW
🔴 Try EpochTV for 25 cents per week: https://ept.ms/3LG4rxt
🔴 WATCH on @AmThoughtLeader: https://ept.ms/Y0318kashPatel
🔵 Sign up for the American Thought Leaders ALERTS newsletter to stay up-to-date on new episodes, releases, and events 👉 https://ept.ms/ATLnewsletter
“How is it factually and legally possible for Nancy Pelosi, the Capitol Police, and Mayor [Muriel] Bowser to reject the National Guard if President Trump didn't previously authorize them? To me, that's the whole case. And now that we have the receipts—we've always had them—now that they're out there for the American people, maybe they can ask those hard questions and finally get to the truth.”
In this episode, I sit down with Kash Patel, senior adviser to former President Donald Trump and author of “Government Gangsters.” We dive into the Initial Findings Report on Jan. 6 by the House Oversight Committee, which corroborates earlier claims that President Trump authorized 20,000 National Guardsmen in advance of the Capitol protest, a crucial fact that, Mr. Patel says, was deliberately withheld from the public by the Jan. 6 committee.
“What Chairman Loudermilk has done, is exposed the fact that evidence was withheld by members of Congress, evidence was destroyed by members of Congress, evidence of innocence was hidden by members of Congress, and evidence was choreographed by members of Congress,” says Mr. Patel. “They just arrested a journalist who was inside the halls of Congress on January 6, reporting on January 6, and doing nothing else—per the video that's been released. And they arrested and charged him federally. Are we now going to arrest journalists in theaters of war because it's illegal for them to be there, who are reporting on the war? You know the standard is a very slippery slope.”
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
8.12K
views
10
comments
Gov. Jeff Landry: Has the Supreme Court Forgotten the Importance of the 1st Amendment? | TEASER
🔴 Try EpochTV for 25 cents per week: https://ept.ms/3LG4rxt
🔵 Watch the Full Episode 👉https://ept.ms/Y0323JeffLandry
🔵 Sign up for the American Thought Leaders ALERTS newsletter to stay up-to-date on new episodes, releases, and events 👉 https://ept.ms/ATLnewsletter
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri, the landmark free speech case revolving around government communications with big tech companies.
“I left the court really scratching my head at some of the questions that the justices offered to the new Solicitor General from Louisiana,” says Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, who was among those who first brought the case against the Biden administration back when he was Louisiana's attorney general.
“Some of the questions seem to really leave you wondering whether or not the Court still has a real appreciation for the First Amendment,” Landry said.
Where is the case headed? What might the Supreme Court decide?
We also take a look at Governor Landry’s first few months as governor and get his take on the Supreme Court allowing Texas to enforce a law on arresting suspected illegal immigrants.
💛 Support us to fight for the truth 👉https://donorbox.org/american-thought-leaders
Find out where you can watch us on cable TV: https://www.ntd.com/tv-providers.html
- - -
Gov. Jeff Landry: Has the Supreme Court Forgotten the Importance of the 1st Amendment?
10.1K
views
5
comments
[CLIP] Government Land Grabs, from ‘Natural Asset Companies’ to Agenda 2030: Margaret Byfield
🔴 Try EpochTV for 25 cents per week: https://ept.ms/3LG4rxt
🔴 WATCH the full episode: https://ept.ms/Y0321MargaretByfield
🔵 Sign up for the American Thought Leaders ALERTS newsletter to stay up-to-date on new episodes, releases, and events 👉 https://ept.ms/ATLnewsletter
“There hasn't been a landowner out there that thought they were selling their ecosystem service rights, because that is really a new creation - created out of thin air. I mean, that's what's so crazy about trying to understand this - our marketplace is based on what a consumer will buy and what they won't. That's what drives our marketplace. This is not something that people will buy or not buy, and that's what's really unique about what they're doing. They're trying to create this new asset class, and they get to arbitrarily decide how much they are valued. So, it's not that the marketplace is going to value them. It's going to be a bureaucrat sitting in a room saying that the air you breathe is worth X, and the air I breathe is worth Y. So, it's all arbitrary.” - Margaret Byfield
#Agenda2030 #30by30 #SustainabilityGoals
8.91K
views
8
comments
[CLIP] AG Murrill Reacts to Supreme Court 1st Amendment Hearing | ATL:NOW
🔴 Try EpochTV for 25 cents per week: https://ept.ms/3LG4rxt
🔴 WATCH on @AmThoughtLeader: https://ept.ms/Y0320LizMurrill
🔵 Sign up for the American Thought Leaders ALERTS newsletter to stay up-to-date on new episodes, releases, and events 👉 https://ept.ms/ATLnewsletter
"I'm cautiously optimistic that the court is going to continue to bullishly protect the First Amendment. ... We can talk through all these legal nuanced questions. But, at the end of the day ... the First Amendment says that the government shall not abridge the freedom of speech. And we have shown a deliberate sprawling intent, not only to do it, but success in doing it."
In this episode, I speak with Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill to get an update on Murthy v. Missouri, the Supreme Court case on government censorship.
"The government here is coming in and pressuring the [social media] platforms to take down what it has designated as 'misinformation' or 'disinformation.' So, it's made itself the arbiter of truth. In fact, it created a whole department to do that," says Ms. Murrill.
We dive into the oral arguments we just heard and discuss standing versus merit, and persuasion or encouragement versus coercion.
"They aren't even acknowledging that they were doing anything wrong. They are just saying that all they were doing was engaging in persuasion. Well, I don't know anybody when the FBI shows up who thinks that's just persuasion. I mean, it's coercive by nature," says Ms. Murrill.
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
8.01K
views
1
comment
‘Non-Binary' Birth Certificates and the WPATH Fraud: Stella O'Malley | TEASER
🔴 Try EpochTV for 25 cents per week: https://ept.ms/3LG4rxt
🔵 Watch the Full Episode 👉 https://ept.ms/Y0326StellaOMalley
🔵 Sign up for the American Thought Leaders ALERTS newsletter to stay up-to-date on new episodes, releases, and events 👉 https://ept.ms/ATLnewsletter
“It's a very beguiling, alluring thought ... You hate yourself and you're 14. And you could be a different person with a different name and a different pronoun and a different body. And nobody will ever be able to refer to the old you. So these kids fall for it.”
As a young girl, Stella O’Malley believed for years she should have been born a boy.
“I would definitely easily have met the criteria that would now be called a diagnosis of childhood onset gender dysphoria ... horrible experience, but I came through it and ultimately became comfortable in my own skin, and ultimately became a mother, which is the thing I'm most proud of and most connected to in my life,” says Ms. O’Malley.
“Those teenagers who still want medical transition, they don't know the fever of wanting a baby that hits people in their 30s, and I wouldn't underestimate it. And these children, because we're only about ten years into this kind-of sharp rise in the numbers of people seeking medical transition, we won't hear about that infertility crisis that's going to hit those for some years now.”
Today, she is a practicing psychotherapist and the founder of <a href="https://genspect.org/">Genspect</a>, which promotes a non-medicalized approach to gender distress. She’s the author of many books, including most recently “<a href="https://whenkidssaytheyretrans.com/">When Kids Say They’re Trans</a>: A Guide for Parents.”
“Something extraordinary has happened within psychology [and] psychotherapy. We've lost our way,” says Ms. O’Malley. “In those years since 1979 when WPATH [World Professional Association for Transgender Health] formed, [there] is a growing, extraordinary kind-of cultural revolution, where you can identify as you wish. And when you identify as you wish, doctors, lawyers, schools, [and] hospitals need to fall into your identity. It's an extraordinary kind of new way of being."
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
💛 Support us to fight for the truth 👉https://donorbox.org/american-thought-leaders
Find out where you can watch us on cable TV: https://www.ntd.com/tv-providers.html
#Genspect #WPATH #StellaOMalley
- - -
‘Non-Binary' Birth Certificates and the WPATH Fraud: Stella O'Malley
5.14K
views
1
comment
New Jan. 6 Scandals: Julie Kelly on Destruction of Evidence and the DNC Pipe Bomb | TEASER
🔴 Try EpochTV for 25 cents per week: https://ept.ms/3LG4rxt
🔵 Watch the Full Episode 👉 https://ept.ms/Y0328JulieKelly
🔵 Sign up for the American Thought Leaders ALERTS newsletter to stay up-to-date on new episodes, releases, and events 👉 https://ept.ms/ATLnewsletter
“Think about this: If you're going to do an investigation into January 6, who's one of the first people you would call to testify, even behind closed doors? FBI Director Christopher Wray—they never interviewed him. They never interviewed Steven D'Antuono, who's in charge of the Washington Field Office who oversaw the entire January 6 criminal investigation.”
In this episode, I catch up with investigative journalist Julie Kelly to get an update on what we know, and still don’t know, about what happened on Jan. 6, 2021.
“Why did the January 6 Select Committee—why did they destroy evidence that they collected? Why are they hiding transcripts from witness interviews at the White House ... and at the Department of Homeland Security? How possibly could text messages belonging to more than two dozen Secret Service agents and officials, including the director, just vanish?”
What are the charges defendants are facing? What was the level of government and law enforcement involvement? Why hasn’t the mystery of the D.C. pipe bomb been solved?
“If you would have told me that two years later—I think that was when we recorded that interview for the [Epoch Times Jan. 6] documentary—that we would still be talking about people being rounded up, investigated, arrested, charged, and convicted now in early 2024, even I would have had a hard time, I think, grasping that that would be the reality. But here we are, in February of 2024. The Department of Justice is now on pace to arrest one January 6 defendant a day this year,” says Ms. Kelly.
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
💛 Support us to fight for the truth 👉https://donorbox.org/american-thought-leaders
Find out where you can watch us on cable TV: https://www.ntd.com/tv-providers.html
#JulieKelly #DonaldTrump #Jan6
- - -
New Jan. 6 Scandals: Julie Kelly on Destruction of Evidence and the DNC Pipe Bomb
3.07K
views
[CLIP] ‘Non-Binary' Birth Certificates and the WPATH Fraud: Stella O'Malley
🔴 Try EpochTV for 25 cents per week: https://ept.ms/3LG4rxt
🔴 WATCH the full episode: https://ept.ms/Y0326StellaOMalley
🔵 Sign up for the American Thought Leaders ALERTS newsletter to stay up-to-date on new episodes, releases, and events 👉 https://ept.ms/ATLnewsletter
"What they have is very, very, very shoddy literature of a small number of children...It started in the Netherlands. This clinic in the Netherlands decided to give children puberty blockers as a way to say, 'Well, they're not happy when they transition as adults. So, maybe if we transition them as children, it'll have better results.' Radical, extraordinary, very heavy experiment, but they decided to do it. They didn't have a control group. So, they didn't have a group of children that they didn't give these interventions to, to follow up. And they took a very healthy group of children. Out of about 150, they took about 70, and they followed these 70 children, and they gave them puberty blockers. They stopped their puberty. And of that 70, 15 backed out of the study. And of those 15, some of them developed diabetes, heart complications, all sorts of issues that you'd want to say, 'what happened there?' And then, of the 55 that were left, they went on, they continued their study, and one of those children died when they were getting cross-sex surgery. And so, I would say, 'One out of 70 died? End of study, End of research, this doesn't work.' The dangers are way too high. The risks are way too high. These are children we're working with. This is inappropriate. But they didn't think that. They thought it was a great success. And doctors came over from America to the Netherlands in 2008, and brought back this highly experimental treatment and started to operate in the U.S." - Stella O’Malley
#GenderTransition #GenderPronouns #GenderIdeology
2.13K
views
3
comments