Official inquiry, tittle tattle
Direct link to parliament TV, https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/5e1f14d2-72b3-488f-a53c-fc94fee92dac
Link to Hansard full transcript, https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-01-16/debates/152B485D-812D-43CC-9D25-C2B651564810/ExcessDeathTrends?highlight=westminster%20hall#contribution-46059AFE-9A03-472B-9364-0BF972E2E7D8
Philip Davies
(Shipley) (Con)
As we have seen in data published by the ONS, non-covid excess deaths continue to run higher than they should. People are dying unexpectedly across all age groups, particularly at home. Since the restrictions in March 2020, there have been 110,000 excess deaths in people’s own homes. In the week ending 22 December 2023, deaths at home were 11% higher than the five-year average. In the first 11 months of 2023, over 21,000 excess deaths took place at home, which is roughly one every 25 minutes.
Last month an article in The Lancet, co-authored by the head of mortality analysis at the ONS, stated that although
“the causes of these excess deaths are likely to be multiple”,
ONS data did show some clear trends—in particular, the “largest relative excess deaths” since the pandemic occurred in young and middle-aged adults, with the number of cardiac deaths happening outside hospitals the most elevated. In other words, young and previously healthy people are dying at home from cardiac-related events, and we do not know why. The article concludes:
“Timely and granular analyses are needed to…inform prevention and disease management efforts.”
Let us be clear: this is not a new phenomenon. Experts have been raising concerns about excess deaths since as early as 2021. I remember seeing an interview with Professor Carl Heneghan, professor of evidence-based medicine at Oxford University, where he called for an investigation into the 75,000 excess deaths at home between March 2020 and October 2021. Some 90% of those excess deaths were not covid-related, but related to things such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Many of those deaths could have been prevented had people not been dissuaded from seeking care, because they were told by the media and the Government to stay at home and protect the NHS. Perhaps they tried to get help but were dismissed by a health service concerned with only one disease.
The calls for an investigation went ignored then, just as they are ignored now. Perhaps the covid inquiry, as others have said, should make better use of Professor Heneghan’s time by asking about this topic rather than the tittle-tattle that it seems to revel in. The pertinent question is: why did we lock down at all? That is what I think did the biggest damage.
We can all speculate on the cause of excess deaths, which are clearly happening, from withdrawal of healthcare during lockdown, the increased risk of sedentary lifestyles and alcohol consumption, the impact of the pandemic and related restrictions on NHS staffing levels, increasing NHS waiting times, lack of access to emergency care, covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions or another unknown cause—perhaps a mix of all of the above. Until the Government commit to a robust and independent investigation, we will not know for sure and the speculation will keep going. That is why the Government need an investigation rapidly.
-
28:51
Sunfellow On COVID-19
1 year agoDr. Tess Lawrie Interviews Dr. David Cartland: No More Injections!
7.59K9 -
3:35
Sunfellow On COVID-19
1 year agoTucker Carlson Interviews Florida's Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo About Damning mRNA Report
2.71K11 -
17:46
TheseAreInterestingTimes
1 month agoDr Ros Jones - 6th May 2024: Part 4 - The Lighthouse Declaration
85 -
8:38
Alice Springs To Mind
3 months agoDr Tess Lawrie on Corruption of the World Health Organization
1562 -
15:35
USAFrontlineDoctors
1 year agoTucker Carlson Tonight : Media are Corrupt, Lying and Truly FAKE
7542 -
1:02:42
Kydae
1 year agoAndrew Tate RARE Interview (James Delingpole)
3.37K1 -
1:16:21
The Open Forum Podcast
10 months ago025 | A Voice from the Vaccine Injured | Tracey Bettridge
4111 -
27:37
Rolling With You
1 month agoDr. John Campbell - Official denial
753 -
3:51
Doctors To Trust
10 months agoANTHONY CHAFFEE 2 | WHO STUDY on meat: “excluded solid research; focused on poor surveys”
64 -
3:47
Doctors To Trust
8 months agoPAUL MASON a- | “Your doctor may be unaware of corruption in ‘expert-reviews’
112