Sewell vs RUSD Supreme Court "Contested elections"
H.O.T. supported This case involves Wis. Stat. 7.54 "Contested elections". which provides: In all contested elections cases, the contesting parties have the right to have the ballots opened and to have all errors of the inspectors, either in counting or refusing to count any ballot, corrected by the board of canvassers or court deciding the contest. The ballots and related materials may be open only in open session of the board of canvassers or in open court and in the presence of the official having custody of them. The petitioners ask the Supreme Court to review Wis. Stat. 7.54 in challenging parties the right to review in open court ballots they assert were miscounted such that an incorrect election outcome will be sustained unless the errors alleged by the challengers are corrected by the circuit [court]?
-
6:42
HOT Government
2 months ago $2.24 earnedDirty Money: The Secret World of Money Laundering in Political Campaigns
8446 -
1:25
WMAR
2 years agoSupreme Court ends eviction moratorium
3301 -
0:52
Reuters
2 years agoAbortion protesters gather outside Supreme Court
69016 -
4:47
American Center for Law and Justice
2 years agoCHALLENGED at the Supreme Court
1.38K4 -
0:41
New York Post
2 years agoSupreme Court ends federal eviction moratorium
1.35K17 -
6:12
Dinesh D'Souza
2 years agoWill the Supreme Court Overturn Roe v. Wade?
2.64K27 -
1:26:03
TruthStream with Joe and Scott
1 day agoDave "Guru" Graham and Natalie Cutler Welsh representing Australia and New Zealand! TruthStream #267 links below!
14.7K4 -
32:18
ROSE UNPLUGGED
2 hours ago“Turks and Caicos is the North Korea of Caribbean Islands”
4.42K -
18:15
RealitySurvival
16 hours agoDIY First Aid & Trauma Kit For The Home
285 -
3:35:42
FRENCHY4185
5 hours agoROAD TO 200 FOLLOWERS !!! XDEFIANT FT. THE BOYS !!!
21.8K