Dr. John Campbell

Many thanks to Dr. Nyjon Eccles for giving us such valuable insights into a natural approach to health. Also this video looks at breast health and prevention of bresat cancer. For more on the work of Dr. Eccles, check out The Natural Doctor on https://thenaturaldoctor.org/

Incidence of Diabetes in Children and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 30th June 2023 Toronto https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2806712?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=063023 Key Points Analysis of 42 studies N = 102,984 youths (<19 years) Incidence of type 1 diabetes was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the pandemic. The findings suggest the need to elucidate possible underlying mechanisms to explain temporal changes Synthesize estimates of changes in incidence rates Minimum observation period of 12 months during and 12 months before the pandemic (Also looked at incidence of DKA in new-onset diabetes during the pandemic.) Results, Type 1 diabetes incidence rates N = 38,149 youths First year of the pandemic, incidence rate ratio = 1.14 During months 13 to 24, incidence rate ratio = 1.27 (Expected 3% to 4% annual increase trends in Europe) Results, Type 2 diabetes incidence rates Ten studies reported incident in both periods. Eight studies, an increase incident of type 2 diabetes Results, DKA incidence rates Fifteen studies Incidence rate ratio = 1.26 Conclusions Future studies are needed to assess whether this trend persists, and may help elucidate possible underlying mechanisms to explain temporal changes. More from the study Some studies reported an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and new-onset diabetes. However, (challenges in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis), concerns about the validity of these studies. Data sets used in other studies did not capture asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 There is no clear mechanism by which COVID-19 could directly or indirectly lead to new-onset type 1 or 2 diabetes. Purported direct mechanisms SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor ACE2 is expressed on insulin-producing β cells There is no clear underlying mechanism explaining the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent increased risk of diabetes. Population-based studies suggest…. that the increase in incidence may be due to an immune-mediated mechanism. Proposed indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and containment measures that may be associated with diabetes (contrary to what would be expected based on the decrease in viral infections among children) ‘Catch-up’ could only influence the first year of the pandemic Reflection on yesterday’s lab leak video and biological war As someone who has spent a number of years studying biological warfare (BW) and ways to defend against it, I'm not convinced that the Wuhan virus was not meant to be a BW agent. High lethality isn't necessarily required to be an effective weapon; it just needs to be able to incapacitate a significant number of people. The incapacitated people are no longer able to do their jobs, and the added benefit to the employer of the weapon is that those incapacitated people now take up more resources and more people to treat them than if they died. Also, the genetic techniques that they used, techniques that made it difficult to identify any man-made changes, is in line with one of the main attractions of BW - plausible deniability.

National Intelligence Officer for Weapons of Mass Destruction and Proliferation https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origins-of-COVID-19-20230623.pdf My impressions Many potential incriminating details from WIV are given Report then systematically tries to downplay the evidence IC genuinely does not know a lot of specifics Background Late March, US Congress, unanimously passed a law Everything US intelligence held on coronavirus origins must be made public. Public Law https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/619/text Not mentioned Only one focus of outbreak No animal intermediate identified Poor WHO visits WIV may have begun developing two Covid vaccines in November 2019 https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23780776-mwg-fdr-document-04-16-23 (Prior to 8th December 2018) U.S. Consulate General in Wuhan An increase in adult Influenza-Like-Illness (ILI) October to November 2019 (accompanied by negative results) statistically significantly higher than reported in the previous 5 years “By mid-October 2019, the dedicated team at the U.S. Consulate General in Wuhan knew that the city had been struck by what was thought to be an unusually vicious flu season. The disease worsened in November.” China CDC None of the samples taken from the 18 animal species found in the market were positive for SARS- CoV-2. EcoHealth Alliance and NIH funding EcoHealth Alliance with the WIV, Project DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses Mid-October to mid-November 2019 WIV collected 20,000 bat and animal samples by 2019, but did not disclose all of the viruses Before 2019, the WIV published sequences in a public database, taken offline in September 2019

19.8% of total VRM was severe COVID-19 vaccination-related myocarditis: a Korean nationwide study https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad339/7188747?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Nationwide study, incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination-related myocarditis (VRM). 44, 276, 704 individuals, at least 1 dose Incidence and clinical courses of VRM cases Diagnosis confirmed by Expert Adjudication Committee of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency COVID-19 VRM 1, 533 presumptive cases Confirmed in 480 cases (1.08 cases per 100 000 persons) Incidence was significantly higher in men Men, 1.35 per 100 000 persons Women, 0.82 per 100 000 persons Males aged 12 to 17, 5.29 cases per 100 000 persons Females over 70, 0.16 cases per 100 000 persons CDC today https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older in the United States for the prevention of COVID-19. Mostly after first or second dose mRNA vaccines compared to other vaccines VRM after mRNA vaccines, 1.46 per 100 000 persons VRM after AZ vaccine, 0.14 per 100 000 persons P les than 0.001 Denmark, VRM https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34916207/ BNT162b2, 1.4 per 100 000 vaccinated individuals mRNA-1273, 4.2 per 100 000 (within 28 days of vaccination) Severe VRM was identified in 95 cases 19.8% of total VRM (0.22 per 100 000 vaccinated persons) 85 intensive care unit admission (17.7% of total VRM) 36 cases of fulminant myocarditis 7.5% of total VRM 21 cases required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4.4% of total VRM) 21 more severe adverse events (4.4% of total VRM) Eight out of 21 were sudden cardiac dea*** (SCD) (attributable to VRM proved by an autopsy) All cases of SCD attributable to VRM were aged under 45 years and received mRNA vaccines 1 heart transplantation Conclusion Moreover, SCD should be closely monitored as a potentially fat** complication of COVID-19 vaccination. Most common presenting symptom Chest pain or discomfort Median time from the vaccination to symptom onset, 3 days (IQR, 1–10 days) COVID-19 VRM incidence was highest in mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna) Followed by BNT162b2 J and J Ad26 0.20 per 100 000 persons AZ ChAdOx1 0.14 per 100 000 persons

BioNTech, first German lawsuit over alleged COVID vaccine side effects https://www.thelocal.com/20230612/german-courts-start-examining-claims-over-covid-jabs/ https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstories/biontech-faces-first-german-lawsuit-over-alleged-covid-vaccine-side-effects/ar-AA1coznF BioNTech to court Postponed for a few days Lawsuit from a German woman, seeking damages for alleged side effects COVID-19 vaccine (first of potentially hundreds of cases) Damages for bodily harm and material damage Claims She suffered vaccine induced upper-body pain, swollen extremities, fatigue and sleeping disorder. Tobias Ulbrich to challenge in court EU and German assessment that the BioNTech has a positive risk-benefit profile. German criteria Makers of drugs or vaccines, only liable if "medical science" shows that their products cause disproportionate harm, or if the label information is wrong. Comirnaty Given to 1.5 billion (64 million in Germany) The European Medicines Agency (EMA) Has registered almost 1.7 million spontaneous reports of suspected side-effects by May (0.2 for every 100 administered doses)

Tory party during lockdown December 2020 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/06/18/michael-gove-tory-lockdown-party-honours/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12206777/Tory-staff-filmed-drinking-dancing-joking-lockdown-rules-boozy-2020-Christmas-party.html Conservative Campaign Headquarters, London December 2020 Staffers working for recently honoured 'Lord Bailey' Dancing and joking about defying lockdown rules At least 24 revellers Two dancing officials, twirling each other past signs saying 'please keep your distance' Staff members heard laughing, hopes that they are not exposed for 'bending the rules.' One man, 'Oh ******.' 'Are you filming this?' 'Er, it's for the party use.' A man then laughs after declaring: 'As long as we are not streaming that we're, like, bending the rules.' One of those captured, Ben Mallett, a senior Tory aide, awarded an OBE Michael Gove “The decision to confer honours on people was one that was made by Boris Johnson as an outgoing prime minister. Outgoing prime ministers have that right,” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/03/tier-1-lockdown-rules-in-england-latest-covid-restrictions-explained https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_in_England_(July–December_2020) December 8th 2020 Health Secretary, Matt Hancock urges Londoners to adhere to COVID-19 regulations as cases rise in London. December 10th 2020 Health Secretary announces that mass testing will be rolled out for secondary schools in the worst affected areas of London, Kent and Essex December 16th 2020 London, and parts of Essex and Hertfordshire, are placed into tier three of England's COVID tier system following an increase in case numbers in those areas https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9068/ Reintroducing a tiered system (December 2020) On 2 December, the tiered system was reintroduced with modifications. On 19 December, the Prime Minister announced that a fourth tier would be introduced, following concerns about a rising number of coronavirus cases due to a new variant (what was to become known as the Alpha variant, first identified in Kent). Questions Were these people told things about the effectiveness (or lack of) of lockdowns the public were not told? Were these people told things about the risks of infection (or lack of) to themselves the public were not told? Were these people told things about anything else, and if so by whom? Did seniors know about this party?

19.8% of total VRM was severe COVID-19 vaccination-related myocarditis: a Korean nationwide study https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad339/7188747?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Nationwide study, incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination-related myocarditis (VRM). 44, 276, 704 individuals, at least 1 dose Incidence and clinical courses of VRM cases Diagnosis confirmed by Expert Adjudication Committee of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency COVID-19 VRM 1, 533 presumptive cases Confirmed in 480 cases (1.08 cases per 100 000 persons) Incidence was significantly higher in men Men, 1.35 per 100 000 persons Women, 0.82 per 100 000 persons Males aged 12 to 17, 5.29 cases per 100 000 persons Females over 70, 0.16 cases per 100 000 persons CDC today https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older in the United States for the prevention of COVID-19. Mostly after first or second dose mRNA vaccines compared to other vaccines VRM after mRNA vaccines, 1.46 per 100 000 persons VRM after AZ vaccine, 0.14 per 100 000 persons P < 0.001 Denmark, VRM https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34916207/ BNT162b2, 1.4 per 100 000 vaccinated individuals mRNA-1273, 4.2 per 100 000 (within 28 days of vaccination) Severe VRM was identified in 95 cases 19.8% of total VRM (0.22 per 100 000 vaccinated persons) 85 intensive care unit admission (17.7% of total VRM) 36 cases of fulminant myocarditis 7.5% of total VRM 21 cases required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4.4% of total VRM) 21 more severe adverse events (4.4% of total VRM) Eight out of 21 were sudden cardiac dea*** (SCD) (attributable to VRM proved by an autopsy) All cases of SCD attributable to VRM were aged under 45 years and received mRNA vaccines 1 heart transplantation Conclusion Moreover, SCD should be closely monitored as a potentially fat** complication of COVID-19 vaccination. Most common presenting symptom Chest pain or discomfort Median time from the vaccination to symptom onset, 3 days (IQR, 1–10 days) COVID-19 VRM incidence was highest in mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna) Followed by BNT162b2 J and J Ad26 0.20 per 100 000 persons AZ ChAdOx1 0.14 per 100 000 persons

BioNTech, first German lawsuit over alleged COVID vaccine side effects https://www.thelocal.com/20230612/german-courts-start-examining-claims-over-covid-jabs/ https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstories/biontech-faces-first-german-lawsuit-over-alleged-covid-vaccine-side-effects/ar-AA1coznF BioNTech to court Postponed for a few days Lawsuit from a German woman, seeking damages for alleged side effects COVID-19 vaccine (first of potentially hundreds of cases) Damages for bodily harm and material damage Claims She suffered vaccine induced upper-body pain, swollen extremities, fatigue and sleeping disorder. Tobias Ulbrich to challenge in court EU and German assessment that the BioNTech has a positive risk-benefit profile. German criteria Makers of drugs or vaccines, only liable if "medical science" shows that their products cause disproportionate harm, or if the label information is wrong. Comirnaty Given to 1.5 billion (64 million in Germany) The European Medicines Agency (EMA) Has registered almost 1.7 million spontaneous reports of suspected side-effects by May (0.2 for every 100 administered doses)

ustralia https://www.actuaries.digital/2023/04/06/covid-19-mortality-working-group-confirmation-of-20000-excess-deaths-for-2022-in-australia/ Excess deaths in 2022 22,000 (12%) excess deaths (Population 26 million) Excess mortality is widely regarded as the best measure of the overall impact of a pandemic, since it includes deaths both directly and indirectly due to the disease. Of the 20,200 excess deaths in 2022 10,300 deaths (51%) were from COVID-19 2,900 deaths (15%) were COVID-19 related, (meaning that COVID-19 contributed to the death) 7,000 deaths (34%) had no mention of COVID-19 on the death certificate. Non-COVID-19 deaths represent excess mortality of 4%, (which is extraordinarily high in itself) Most excess deaths were in 65+ But, excess mortality was at least 5% higher in ALL age groups It is notable that there are excess deaths in all age groups, and that this excess is generally significant, even after removing COVID-19 deaths Excess deaths higher in females than males The differences are worth investigating, (although the small numbers mean that there is considerable natural variation) Excess mortality in all States WA excess deaths were delayed due to late reopening Many more deaths from IHD Ischaemic heart disease Much higher number of deaths than expected from IHD (despite continued deaths from dementia) Deaths from respiratory disease have been significantly lower than expected throughout the pandemic

Covid disinformation unit 'hourly contact' with tech firms https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/06/09/david-davis-counter-disinformation-unit-shut-down-lockdown/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/09/covid-disinformation-unit-hourly-tech-lockdown-dissent/ British civil service, secretive government unit Flagged critics of lockdown and pandemic policy https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/counter-disinformation-unit-open-source-information-collection-and-analysis-privacy-notice/counter-disinformation-unit-open-source-information-collection-and-analysis-privacy-notice A secretive government Covid unit (CDU), (A cell within government) accused of seeking to supress free speech “hourly” contact with social media firms The civil servant in charge, Sarah Connolly, pandemic and now (previously job, anti-terror policies for the Home Office) one of the Counter Disinformation Unit’s main functions “passing information over” Facebook and Twitter “encourage the swift takedown” of posts CDU worked with social media, to curtail discussion of controversial lockdown policies “almost all” social media platforms, discussions were “daily, sometimes hourly”. “If somebody from the cell says: ‘We are worried about this,’ that goes immediately to the top of the pile. Whoever it is in whatever company.” “big” function, “talking to social media platforms and passing information over. It gets information back from them, and encourages that swift takedown – the swift dealing with the platforms. The cell has daily interactions with almost all the platforms”. David Davis “Early on, during the early part of the Covid pandemic, I began to worry that we weren’t really making decisions on science,” “A lot of the arguments at the time were not really between science and non-science. They were between authority and non-authority.” Whitehall is all about control of information. Information is power. They know that so they tend to hoard it for themselves. Monitored and comments were logged by CDU Now DD called for the CDU to be shut, and for a parliamentary committee to investigate “most paranoid wing of Government is interfering in the democratic process” “There would be a limit to what they could do 25 years ago... The trouble today is we don’t know what the algorithms do. We have no idea what deal they’ve struck with Google or Twitter or whoever. And that’s a really serious influence on debate, not just in Britain, but across the entire world.” Parliamentary inquiry with the “biggest combination of power, access and speed” now needed BBC, accused of acting as “the broadcast arm of the Government” Now Growing speculation CDU may have links to intelligence The Government confirmed last night Social media firms, taken action on more than 90% of referrals Deleted or using algorithms to get low views Seems to have been another group; Counter-Disinformation Policy Forum A group, which included a member of BBC staff, tech companies, academics, lobby groups. ‘Climate of fear’ over anti-Government reporting at BBC Current and former BBC staff In those who suggested BBC reporting lacked balance branded “dissenters”. CDU takes a broad view of what qualifies as disinformation. Mrs Connolly, addressing MPs the most concerning types of anti-vaccine material included discussions about side-effects and the speed of production Connolly took control like a ‘puppeteer’ A revolving door of culture secretaries Rapid succession of ministers Lack of oversight from No 10 Government sources “As a hard-working civil servant, she’s an impartial adviser – not a puppeteer,” Social media posts, CDU and Rapid Response Unit Dr. Alexandre de Figueiredo, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, argued against mass vaccination of children against Questions about CDU Budget Number of workers Use of external AI firms List of people targeted A Government spokesman “When referrals were made during Covid, over 90% of them were ultimately found to be in breach of terms of service.” Facebook owner Meta Does not “allow false claims about the vaccines or vaccination programmes which public health experts have advised us could lead to Covid-19 vaccine rejection. This includes false claims about the safety, efficacy, ingredients, development, existence or conspiracies related to the vaccine or vaccination programme”.

Fact check, Jacinda Arden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENEUktOrQV8 I want to send a clear message to the New Zealand public, we will share with you the most up to date information daily, you can trust us as the source of that information You can also trust the director general of health and the minister of health. For that information, do feel free to visit an any time to clarify any rumour you may hear. Covid-19.govt.nz Otherwise dismiss anything else We will continue to be your single source of truth (Video, 3 years ago) Richard Dawkins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCLR32agbsg Did Professor Dawkins say the government did not know about the efficacy of covid vaccines? Matt Hancock and vitamin D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAp0vJrOw7k Did he say it does not work? https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vitamin-d-for-vulnerable-groups/vitamin-d-and-clinically-extremely-vulnerable-cev-guidance Current advice on vitamin D In the UK during autumn and winter everyone is advised to take a supplement containing 10 micrograms (400 international units) of vitamin D a day to support general health and in particular bone and muscle health. This is because we cannot make vitamin D from sunlight at this time of year.

Free download of the irrelevant posters seen in this video, https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/ WHO’s Global Digital Health Certification Network EU-WHO digital partnership https://www.who.int/news/item/05-06-2023-the-european-commission-and-who-launch-landmark-digital-health-initiative-to-strengthen-global-health-security https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBcC_QMwhg8 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/coronavirus-response/safe-covid-19-vaccines-europeans/eu-digital-covid-certificate_en

WHO’s Global Digital Health Certification Network https://www.who.int/initiatives/global-digital-health-certification-network WHO has established the Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN). Open-source platform, built on robust & transparent standards, that establishes the first building block of digital public health infrastructure, for developing a wide range of digital products, for strengthening pandemic preparedness Background Member States used digital COVID-19 test and vaccine certificates As the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, at the onset of the pandemic, WHO engaged with all WHO Regions to define overall guidance for such certificates and published the Digital Documentation of COVID-19 Certificates https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Digital_certificates-vaccination-2021.1 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Digital_certificates_diagnostic_test_results-2022.1 there is a recognition of an existing gap, and continued need for a global mechanism, that can support bilateral verification of the provenance of health documents The GDHCN may include Digitisation of the International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis, verification of prescriptions across borders International Patient Summary Verification of vaccination certificates within and across borders Certification of public health professionals (through WHO Academy) Expanding such digital solutions will be essential to deliver better health for people across the globe. The GDHCN has been designed to be interoperable with other existing regional networks EU-WHO digital partnership https://www.who.int/news/item/05-06-2023-the-european-commission-and-who-launch-landmark-digital-health-initiative-to-strengthen-global-health-security https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBcC_QMwhg8 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/coronavirus-response/safe-covid-19-vaccines-europeans/eu-digital-covid-certificate_en WHO and the European Commission have agreed to partner in digital health. This partnership will work to technically develop the WHO system with a staged approach to cover additional use cases, In June 2023, WHO will take up the European Union (EU) system of digital COVID-19 certification to establish a global system, that will help facilitate global mobility This is the first building block of the WHO Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN) Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO aims to offer all WHO Member States access, On the principles of equity, innovation, transparency and data protection and privacy Stella Kyriakides, Commissioner for Health and Food Safety This partnership is an important step for the digital action plan of the EU Global Health Strategy, we contribute to digital health standards and interoperability globally Thierry Breton, Commissioner for Internal Market The EU certificate … has also facilitated international travel and tourism I am pleased that the WHO will build on …. cutting-edge technology … to create a global tool against future pandemics One of the key elements in the European Union’s work against the COVID-19 pandemic has been digital COVID-19 certificates. WHO will facilitate this process globally under its own structure … allow the world to benefit from convergence of digital certificates. Expanding such digital solutions will be essential to deliver better health for citizens across the globe. The WHO and the European Commission will work together to encourage maximum global uptake and participation.

Lockdowns were a costly failure COVID-19 lockdowns were ‘a global policy failure of gigantic proportions’ 5th June 2023 update https://iea.org.uk/publications/did-lockdowns-work-the-verdict-on-covid-restrictions/ Previous January 2022 publication https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf Systematic review and meta-analysis Published by Institute of Economic Affairs (London) Did lockdowns, (Covid restrictions, social distancing measures etc.) Effect COVID-19 mortality, based on empirical evidence. Systematic search and screening procedure 19,646 studies identified 32 studies qualified. Of those, 22 studies could convert for meta- analysis. 22 studies based on actual, measured mortality data, not results derived from modelling. Stringency index studies (when compared to less strict lockdown policies e.g. Sweden) Average lockdown in Europe and the United States, in the spring of 2020, only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 3.2% This translates into Approximately 6,000 avoided deaths in Europe, and 4,000 in the United States. Shelter-in-place-order (SIPO) Relatively ineffective in the spring of 2020, reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.0% 4,000 avoided deaths in Europe, and 3,000 in the United States. Specific NPIs Spring of 2020 Reduced COVID-19 mortality by 10.7% (significantly less than estimates produced by epidemiological modelling) That’s approximately 23,000 avoided deaths in Europe, and 16,000 in the United States. Imperial College of London’s modelling exercises (March 2020), predicted lockdowns would save over 400,000 lives in the United Kingdom, and over 2 million lives in the United States In comparison, annual flu deaths Approximately 72,000 flu deaths in Europe, and 38,000 flu deaths in the United States England and Wales, 18,500–24,800 flu deaths When checked for potential biases, our results are robust. Our results are also supported by the natural experiments we have been able to identify. The results of our meta-analysis support the conclusion that lockdowns in the spring of 2020 had a negligible effect on COVID-19 mortality. This result is consistent with the view that voluntary changes in behaviour, such as social distancing, did play an important role in mitigating the pandemic. Voluntary measures, effectively reduced COVID mortality in Sweden (consistent with evidence early in the pandemic that voluntary action began reducing transmission before lockdowns) This negative conclusion is amplified by significant economic and social costs Stunted economic growth Large increases in public debt Rising inequality Damage to children’s education and health Reduced health-related quality of life Increased crime Threats to democracy and loss of freedom (Covid Disinformation Unit, 77 Brigade) Damage to mental health https://digital.nhs.uk/services/organisation-data-service/export-data-files/csv-downloads/office-for-national-statistics-data Conclusion Unless substantial alternative evidence emerges, lockdowns should be ‘rejected out of hand’ to control future pandemics. The science of lockdowns is clear; the data are in: the deaths saved were a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering collateral costs imposed. Professor Lars Jonung, Sweden, Lund University “This study is the first all-encompassing evaluation of the research on the effectiveness of mandatory restrictions on mortality,” “It demonstrates that lockdowns were a failed promise. They had negligible health effects but disastrous economic, social and political costs to society. Most likely lockdowns represent the biggest policy mistake in modern times.” Jonas Herby, Copenhagen “Numerous misleading studies, driven by subjective models and overlooking significant factors like voluntary behaviour changes, heavily influenced the initial perception of lockdowns as highly effective measures. Our meta-analysis suggests that when researchers account for additional variables, such as voluntary behaviour, the impact of lockdowns becomes negligible.” Professor Steve H. Hanke, Johns Hopkins University “When it comes to COVID, epidemiological models have many things in common: dubious assumptions, hair-raising predictions of disaster that miss the mark, and few lessons learned. “The science of lockdowns is clear; the data are in: the lives saved were a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering collateral costs imposed.” https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/04/first-lockdown-prevented-1700-deaths-landmark-study-finds/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/04/cost-of-lockdown-negligible-health-benefits-for-liberty/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/04/covid-19-lockdowns-less-effective-new-research-inquiry/ https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jun/05/revised-report-on-impact-of-covid-lockdowns-leaves-unanswered-questions

Dr Ros Jones is a retired consultant paediatrician who came to the attention of the Counter Disinformation Unit set up by the British government. In this video Dr Jones describes her (very early) concerns about new medical interventions, and how this led to her being reported. Open letter to Dr. Ros Jones https://www.hartgroup.org/reply-from-mhra-re-childrens-covid-vaccination/

UK government, Counter Disinformation Unit (‘CDU’) Counter-Disinformation Unit – open source information collection and analysis: privacy notice https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/counter-disinformation-unit-open-source-information-collection-and-analysis-privacy-notice https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/counter-disinformation-unit-open-source-information-collection-and-analysis-privacy-notice/counter-disinformation-unit-open-source-information-collection-and-analysis-privacy-notice The CDU leads the UK government’s operational response to disinformation threats online, and ensures the government takes necessary steps to identify and respond to acute misinformation (i.e. incorrect or misleading information) and disinformation (i.e. information which is deliberately created to cause harm), in areas of public interest. The purpose of the CDU’s work is focused on helping the government understand online disinformation narratives, and attempts to artificially manipulate the information environment. The CDU takes an evidence-based approach to countering harmful disinformation online, through aggregated analysis of publicly available information, typically from social media. Whilst this data is anonymised wherever possible, the content we review may incidentally include personal data, that may be embedded within material that you or others may have published on those sites In some cases, such content may include special categories of personal data, such as political or philosophical opinions. We may share our analysis with other government departments CDU may notify the relevant platform. The CDU has appointed a third party to help conduct analysis of social media platforms. We will not send personal data beyond the European Economic Area Elon Musk joins backlash over secret unit curbing lockdown dissent https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06/03/elon-musk-backlash-secret-unit-curbing-lockdown-dissent/ Counter-disinformation Unit (CDU), set up by ministers during the pandemic, collaborated with social media, monitor the activities of prominent lockdown critics and those who questioned the mass vaccination of children. https://twitter.com/search?q=elon%20musk%20terrible&src=typed_query Some critics of lockdown had their posts removed, suspicion is growing that the CDU flagged them to social media The Government used an artificial intelligence firm to comb social media sites, and alert them to discussions opposing vaccine passports. Silkie Carlo, Big Brother Watch https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk The Counter Disinformation Unit should be suspended immediately and subject to a full investigation. The war on misinformation has suffered serious mission creep, and become a blank cheque for the government to secretly monitor and control narratives online in a shocking abuse of power. Millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money wasted funding civil servants, AI companies, even the British military, https://www.army.mod.uk/who-we-are/formations-divisions-brigades/6th-united-kingdom-division/77-brigade/ to monitor academics, journalists, campaigners and members of parliament, who have criticised government policies, despite many of those criticisms being later vindicated. Jacob Rees-Mogg called for the Covid inquiry to investigate “oppressive” government disinformation units. “The inquiry clearly ought to investigate the oppressive methods used to override dissent,” the apparent use of “underhand methods” should not be happening in a free country. Among those targeted by the Government Professor Carl Heneghan, Oxford epidemiologist (Campaigned to keep schools open) Molly Kingsley (Us for them) https://twitter.com/search?q=%20Molly%20Kingsley%20The%20positions%20we’ve%20advocated&src=typed_query pre 2020 Secretive meetings BBC, took part in secretive meetings of Counter-Disinformation Policy Forum

I believe this is an existential threat to Europe, hard to quantify but real. Zaporizhzhia atomic plant Introduction video UN International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi https://news.sky.com/video/ukraine-un-watchdog-warns-of-potential-accident-at-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-power-plant-12893526 https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-war-workers-at-deteriorating-zaporizhzhia-plant-fear-devastation-on-a-scale-worse-than-chernobyl-12893115 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cI1pY7E444 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JKoTpKj9RM Dnipro River in Russian-occupied Ukraine Europe's largest nuclear power station Worker Serhii Devastation, much of Europe, Russia, Mediterranean The level of radioactive pollution, and most importantly the area of contamination, will be thousands of square kilometres of land and sea… it would be much, much worse than Fukushima and worse than Chernobyl. Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, captured by Russian, March 2022 Shells and rocket hits Russia targeting power lines Seven power cuts since March 2022 Back-up generators, poor quality work force 11,000 staff now down to 3,500 Big leak could stop any southern Ukrainian counteroffensive Level of military activity has increased Worker Serhii Ukrainian armed forces will not shell the station Worker Mykola Everyone has their own story. And I think the most important thing is not to get into their hands because it's unlikely you will get out and still be the human you were when you went in. The International Atomic Energy Agency Calling for area to be demilitarised immediately Chernobyl 4 reactor 1986 https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-the-chernobyl-accident 29,400 km2 was contaminated above 180 kBq/m2 530,000 liquidators irradiated, 120 millisieverts (mSv) Global average annual dose of 2.4 mSv natural background radiation (UK 2.7 mSv) https://www.greenfacts.org/en/chernobyl/toolboxes/half-life-radioisotopes.htm Iodine -131 (8 days) Caesium-137 (30 years) Strontium-90 (29 years) Plutonium-241 (14 years, 430 years) Fissile uranium U-235 isotope (703 million years) Potassium Iodide for Nuclear Radiation Emergencies https://www.webmd.com/first-aid/potassium-iodide-radiation You’ll take potassium iodide before or right after you’re exposed to radioactive iodine, 3 to 4 hours after won’t be as effective. Take the medication once a day until the risk of radiation exposure no longer exists. Most important Pregnant or lactating women Newborns Children Doses of potassium iodide Adults, 130-milligram pill 12- 18, over 150 pounds, (68Kg) 130-milligram pill 12- 18, under 150 pounds, (68Kg) 65-milligram pill 3 to 12, one 65-milligram pill Newborns to one month, 16.25 mg https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/iodine/ Adults need 140 micrograms (μg) of iodine a day. Family protection https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nuclear-emergencies-information-for-the-public Sheltering Staying indoors with doors and windows closed, degree of protection from breathing in radioactive material, and dust / fall out Evacuation Stable iodine tablets Food Soil - grass – plants food chains Milk or other foods Eating contaminated food, build up over time

AMENDMENTS TO THE IHR https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-top-6-reasons-to-speak-out-against PANDEMIC TREATY UPDATE: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/pandemic-treaty-update-f46 WORLDWIDE ACTION: http://WORLDWIDE.ExitTheWHO.com UNITED KINGDOM PETITION: http://UK.StopTheAmendments.com AUSTRALIA PETITION: http://Australia.StopTheAmendments.com UNITED STATES PUBLIC COMMENT http://SilenceEqualsConsent.com PORTUGAL PETITION FOR REFERENDUM http://PORTUGAL.ExitTheWHO.com SOUTH AFRICA PETITION https://SouthAfrica1.ExitTheWHO.com Thanks again. Please feel free to share my contact information with anyone. Sincerely, James Roguski Phone | Text | Signal | WhatsApp | Telegram +1-310-619-3055 Skype: james.roguski http://JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive

Covid-19 vaccination can induce multiple sclerosis via cross-reactive CD4+ T cells recognizing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and myelin peptides https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-2138820?lang=en Both natural infection and the mRNA based vaccinations can be accompanied by transient autoimmune phenomena, or onset of autoimmune diseases. Objective Two cases of multiple sclerosis (MS), with clinical and new radiological signs, beginning in close temporal relation to spike (S) protein mRNA based vaccinations. Aim The onset of MS in these two cases is very likely caused by CD4+ T cell clones, that cross-recognize SARSCoV- 2 S protein, from myelin proteins. Method Spike specific CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood, and CD4+ T cells from CSF sample were isolated, then underwent autoantigen screening test. (An endogenous antigen that stimulates the production of autoantibodies) A list of well-known MS related autoantigens, Result(s) Self-reactive T cells were detected from Spike specific T cell population, also showed reactivity to MBP, MOG, (Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein) peptides PLP peptide pools. Multiple sclerosis and myelin basic protein: insights into protein disorder and disease https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8810476/ Myelin basic protein (MBP) is an abundant protein in central nervous system (CNS) myelin. MBP has long been studied as a factor in the pathogenesis of the autoimmune neurodegenerative disease multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is characterized by CNS inflammation, demyelination, and axonal loss. Finally, we found proinflammatory T cell clones, that recognize both Spike protein and immunodominant Myelin basic protein peptides, and Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptides, which have previously been implicated in MS. Conclusion(s) Detailed studies of both peripheral blood, and CSF derived CD4+ T cells show that the onset of MS in these two cases is very likely caused by CD4+ T cell clones that cross-recognize SARS-CoV-2 S protein derived peptides and peptides derived from myelin proteins, which have previously been implicated in MS. Posts misrepresent research on multiple sclerosis and COVID-19 vaccines found in WHO database https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-WHO-COVID-multiple-sclerosis-591321248797 New diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in the setting of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine exposure (January 2022) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34922126/ Multiple sclerosis (MS) with onset in the setting of acute SARS-CoV-2 virus infection has been reported, and reactivation of MS following non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination has been noted, There have been three reports of newly diagnosed MS following exposure to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The association cannot be determined to be causal, We report a series of 5 cases of newly diagnosed MS following recent exposure to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Latency from vaccination to initial presentation varied. Neurological manifestations and clinical course appeared to be typical for MS, including response to high dose steroids Conclusion Acute neurological deficits in the setting of recent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administration may represent new onset multiple sclerosis. Hold a parliamentary vote on whether to reject amendments to the IHR 2005 https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/635904 https://twitter.com/Johnincarlisle We are concerned that Parliament has not discussed and will not have a say on the 307 proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, AND the amendments to 5 Articles of the IHR that were ADOPTED by the 75th World Health Assembly on 27 May 2022.

Well, Norman asked some firm questions, which is great. We need to be open, honest and change thinking as the evidence leads. Link to Norman’s YT channel, https://www.youtube.com/@NormanFenton81 And Substack, https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com

Article by Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf My previous videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXdO_7J1Lx8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooKyYEvIhYk Mr. Rob Roos MEP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_19i26FmAY WHO could gain powers to impose lockdown on UK MPs fear new treaty designed to increase the organisation’s powers would enable it to enforce border closures and vaccine passports https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/05/25/who-pandemic-treaty-lockdown-uk-ministers-fear/ A new “pandemic treaty” under discussion Lockdown measures could be imposed on the UK by the World Health Organisation (WHO) Under sweeping new powers Member states Obliged to follow the agency’s instructions, Force Britain to spend five per cent of its health budget on preparing for another virus outbreak Plus a proportion of GDP Plans to increase the WHO’s powers Require countries to hand over the recipe of vaccines To counter misinformation Enforce border closures Quarantine measures Vaccine passports Conservative MPs Written to ministers, “ambition evident…for the WHO to transition from an advisory organisation to a controlling international authority” Urge the Foreign Office to block powers that “appear to intrude materially into the UK’s ability to make its own rules and control its own budgets”. Changes to make WHO advice 'binding' Part of post pandemic plans, WHO’s International Health Regulations First proposed in 2021 by world leaders Improve alert systems, data-sharing, production of vaccines “foster an all of government and all of society approach”. Now, 300 proposed amendments to the IHRs WHO’s advice “binding” “recognise WHO as the guidance and coordinating authority of international public health response…and undertake to follow WHO’s recommendations in their international public health response”. 'Particularly worrying' Six conservative MPs, Esther McVey Written to Andrew Mitchell, (Foreign Office minister), to call for a Commons vote on the draft treaty and regulations before they are signed. Ms McVey There is, rightly, growing concern about the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulations. The plans represent a significant shift for the organisation, from a member-led advisory body to a health authority with powers of compulsion. This is particularly worrying when you consider the WHO’s poor track record on providing consistent, clear and scientifically sound advice for managing international disease outbreaks (Sir John Redwood, David Davis, Philip Davies, Sir Christopher Chope and Danny Kruger) Mr Kruger “Coordination and cooperation in a public health emergency is sensible but ceding control over health budgets and critical decision-making in a pandemic to an unelected international organisation seems profoundly at odds with national autonomy and democratic accountability.” Campaigners also expressed concern about increasing the WHO’s role in identifying misinformation (lab leak changes of view) Molly Kingsley, UsForThem “We should all be concerned about the WHO being ordained as an arbiter of pandemic truth, especially given its poor record during the pandemic, such as its claim that Covid was definitively zoonotic in origin and its April 2020 denial of the role of natural immunity in protecting against infection.”

Number of UK people with heart rhythm condition rises by 50% in a decade https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-archive/2023/may/new-figures-show-the-number-of-uk-people-with-heart-rhythm-condition Atrial fibrillation, 1.5 million sufferers in the UK 1milloin in 2013 – a 50% rise over the decade. One in 45 people in the UK Five times more likely to stroke, potentially fatal or life-changing Believed to contribute to one in five strokes Estimated, at least another 270,000 people undiagnosed (= 1,770,000) Symptoms of atrial fibrillation Palpitations Breathlessness Dizziness Paroxysmal Our medical director Professor Sir Nilesh Samani These figures show a quite astonishing rise in the number of people diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Research has helped us understand the links between atrial fibrillation and stroke We also need to continue to harness the power of science to develop new and innovative tools for identifying people at increased risk BHF The figures have been released as we launch a new campaign calling on the public to support our research The campaign aims to inspire people’s wonder at the complexity and preciousness of their own hearts and how lifesaving research can help if it goes wrong. Questions What was the rate of increase or change in prevalence during 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023? Has the increase been correlated with any particular factors that have changed between 2019 and 2023? What is the strength of any possible correlations? Is there temporality with possible correlations? Is there a plausible mechanism to explain correlations? How do UK figures of increased AF relate to other countries? Are there any common factors that connect potential changes across differing countries? https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(22)00079-5/fulltext June 2022 Data only up to 31 December 2017 https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/atrial-fibrillation/ See a GP or call 111 if: • you have chest pain that comes and goes • you have chest pain that goes away quickly but you're still worried • you notice a sudden change in your heartbeat • your heart rate is consistently lower than 60 or above 100 (particularly if you're experiencing other symptoms of atrial fibrillation, such as dizziness and shortness of breath) It's important to get medical advice to make sure it's nothing serious.

Norman’s sub stack, https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/about Canada excess deaths https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2021028-eng.htm

This is not good for truth and reality.