Jeanne Herman Targeted in Deliberate Action by Clara Andriola, Mariluz Garcia, and Alexis Hill

Unveiling the Coordinated Operation: A Shocking Turn of EventsShow more

In a surprising twist, the collaborative efforts of Clara Andriola, Mariluz Garcia, and Alexis Hill to undermine Jeanne Herman's candidacy for the Chair position come to light. What initially seemed like a routine Commission agenda meeting takes a dark and calculated turn, revealing the depths of political maneuvering.

The Art of Verbal Acrobatics: Mariluz Garcia's Deceptive Praise

The orchestrated operation commences with Mariluz Garcia's seemingly complimentary remarks about Jeanne Herman. However, Garcia skillfully employs verbal acrobatics, subtly portraying Herman as well-intentioned yet mentally challenged, creating the groundwork for a narrative that challenges her suitability for the Chair.

Shaky Foundations: Garcia's Motion and the Illusive Pillars

Garcia's motion to retain Alexis Hill as Chair and demote Jeanne Herman to Vice Chair hinges on fragile grounds—continuity and the national election year backdrop. The focus shifts from qualifications to a carefully crafted narrative positioning Herman as incapable of leading the Commission during a crucial period.

Selective Accusations: Garcia's Attempt to Paint Herman Negligent

Adding to the intrigue, Garcia selectively accuses Herman of missing Commission agenda meetings, aiming to create an impression of negligence. Yet, the true motive seems to be the preservation of a front-facing chair occupied by Alexis Hill, escalating the controversy surrounding the orchestrated event.

Andriola's Alignment and Veiled Denunciation: A Democratic Perspective

Clara Andriola, aligning herself with the Democrats 87% of the time, joins the chorus of denunciation. Citing Herman's past opportunity to assume the Chair, Andriola argues that Herman's absence from agenda meetings disqualifies her. The thinly veiled condescension and backhanded praise underscore the staged nature of the event.

Bitter Aftertaste: Unraveling the Political Manipulation

The entire affair leaves a bitter taste of political manipulation, prompting serious questions about the integrity of the Commission's decision-making process. As the dust settles, the orchestrated plot against Jeanne Herman raises concerns about transparency and fairness, casting a shadow over the Commission's credibility.